PWGLF: provisions for UPC Lambdas, occupancy studies, v0 type checker#6303
Merged
Conversation
ddobrigk
requested review from
BongHwi,
ChiaraDeMartin95,
alibuild,
chiarapinto,
ercolessi,
fmazzasc,
mbombara,
njacazio and
skundu692
as code owners
njacazio
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
echizzal
pushed a commit
to echizzal/O2Physics
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
…AliceO2Group#6303) * PWGLF: provisions for UPC Lambdas, occupancy studies, v0 type checker * Please consider the following formatting changes (AliceO2Group#302) --------- Co-authored-by: ALICE Builder <alibuild@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@pbuehler @rolavick this will hopefully allow for studying the properties of Lambdas with no collision association; it by the way automatically includes a TOF delta-time compatibility check that should be enough for the time compatibility requirement.
@romainschotter this includes a V0 type check + a first-order occupancy minimum/maximum boundary configurable so we can check the raw yield per event and how that changes with occupancy.