From f714111774606adc46e4dc388afc42cf3885d528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Claude Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:14:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] content: wire cross-links between extrabiblical entries and siblings (#1576) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Final Phase-1 content issue. Performs the single coordinated wire-up pass that #1541, #1544, #1545, #1551 deliberately deferred by shipping with empty related_*_ids[] arrays. Now that all the sibling content has landed (or is in PRs), this back-fill populates the cross-references across the 12 extrabiblical entries. File content/meta/extrabiblical.json — three arrays populated per entry: related_debate_ids, related_journey_ids, related_difficult_passage_ids Cross-link matrix applied (per issue spec) Entry Debates Journey Difficult ───────────────────── ─────── ─────── ───────── 1_enoch 3 1 4 2_enoch 1 1 0 jubilees 2 1 1 jasher 0 1 0 assumption_of_moses 1 1 1 tobit 3 1 0 judith 3 1 0 wisdom_of_solomon 2 1 0 sirach 2 1 0 1_maccabees 2 1 0 4_ezra 1 1 0 damascus_document 2 1 0 All 12 entries have at least journey='canon-formation' linking back to the Phase-3 journey. Entries with significant NT-passage weight (1_enoch, jubilees, assumption_of_moses) also link to the Phase-1 difficult-passage entries that unpack the specific NT texts they illuminate. Entries central to canon-formation debates (tobit, judith, wisdom, sirach, 1 maccabees) link to the debate topics on apocrypha exclusion, Jerome vs Augustine, and Trent. No new content. No schema changes. No code changes. Only the three cross-reference arrays on extrabiblical.json entries are modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) All cross-reference IDs sourced from the matrix in the issue, which was itself generated against: - debate topics authored in #1544 / PR #1592 - difficult passages authored in #1545 / PR #1594 - canon-formation journey authored in #1551 / PR #1601 Merge order (must-follow chain) This is the LAST link in the full_summary chain + cross-link wire-up. Depends on #1541, #1544, #1545, #1551, and #1553-#1579 (the four full_summary batches) all being merged first for the referenced IDs to resolve. Cannot merge before those land. Branched off feature/hwgtb-p4-02d-full-summary-batch4 so the 12 entries already have brief_summary + full_summary + this PR's cross-link arrays populated simultaneously. Closes #1576 --- content/meta/extrabiblical.json | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/meta/extrabiblical.json b/content/meta/extrabiblical.json index 06c951f61..799cdd0e4 100644 --- a/content/meta/extrabiblical.json +++ b/content/meta/extrabiblical.json @@ -52,9 +52,20 @@ "position": "Evangelical NT perspective: Jude's citation shows the book was widely known and respected in some first-century Jewish-Christian circles, but citation does not entail canonisation — Paul likewise cites Greek poets in Acts 17 and Titus 1 without implying their inspiration." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], - "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture", + "who-are-the-nephilim", + "second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], + "related_difficult_passage_ids": [ + "jude-quotes-enoch", + "nephilim-sons-of-god", + "angels-that-sinned", + "jesus-preaching-to-spirits" + ], "tags": [ "apocalyptic", "watchers", @@ -115,8 +126,12 @@ "position": "Places 2 Enoch among the Second Temple apocalypses in his wider studies of apocalyptic literature, while cautioning that its composition history and textual transmission are considerably more obscure than those of 1 Enoch or 4 Ezra." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "apocalyptic", @@ -176,9 +191,16 @@ "position": "Places Jubilees within the broader wisdom and apocalyptic streams of Second Temple Judaism, noting how its angelology and eschatology draw on and develop material shared with 1 Enoch." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], - "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology", + "dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], + "related_difficult_passage_ids": [ + "nephilim-sons-of-god" + ], "tags": [ "rewritten-bible", "second-temple", @@ -242,7 +264,9 @@ } ], "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "lost-source", @@ -300,9 +324,15 @@ "position": "In his commentary and survey work on the General Epistles, follows the patristic and modern consensus that Jude 9 alludes to the lost ending of the Assumption of Moses. Treats Jude's use of the tradition as a rhetorical illustration (similar to the Enoch citation in Jude 14–15), arguing that allusion to a Jewish pseudepigraphon does not entail canonical endorsement of the source text." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], - "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], + "related_difficult_passage_ids": [ + "michael-moses-body" + ], "tags": [ "second-temple", "testamentary-literature", @@ -358,8 +388,14 @@ "position": "In Jewish Literature Between the Bible and the Mishnah, treats Tobit as a representative example of Second Temple diaspora narrative — a pious novella combining wisdom teaching, angelology, and family drama, meant to sustain Jewish identity and practice under foreign rule." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha", + "jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha", + "trent-response-or-innovation" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "deuterocanon", @@ -425,8 +461,14 @@ "position": "Reads Judith as a late Hasmonean Jewish novella composed to encourage Torah-observant resistance under foreign domination. Places it alongside Tobit, Susanna, and 2 Maccabees as examples of edifying Second Temple narrative fiction." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha", + "jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha", + "trent-response-or-innovation" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "deuterocanon", @@ -496,8 +538,13 @@ "position": "In his work on the New Testament background, identifies Wisdom of Solomon as the most important single Jewish extra-canonical text for understanding Paul's argument in Romans 1:18–32 and the Christological language of Hebrews 1 and Colossians 1." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha", + "jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "deuterocanon", @@ -560,8 +607,13 @@ "position": "In his studies of Second Temple wisdom literature, traces Sirach's synthesis of Proverbs-style wisdom with identification of Wisdom and Torah (ch 24), and surveys the book's enormous influence on later Jewish and Christian ethical instruction." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha", + "jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "deuterocanon", @@ -628,8 +680,13 @@ "position": "In his survey work on Second Temple Judaism, places 1 Maccabees alongside 2 Maccabees, Josephus, and the Qumran scrolls as the foundational sources for reconstructing the political and religious matrix from which both rabbinic Judaism and early Christianity emerged." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha", + "trent-response-or-innovation" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "deuterocanon", @@ -688,8 +745,12 @@ "position": "In his work on the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple literature, draws attention to 4 Ezra 14's canon-formation narrative — ninety-four books, of which twenty-four are for all and seventy are esoteric — as a significant witness to how first-century Jews imagined the boundaries of their scriptural tradition." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "apocalyptic", @@ -752,8 +813,13 @@ "position": "In his work on Second Temple apocalypticism, places the Damascus Document within the broader stream of sectarian Jewish self-definition, highlighting its distinctive halakhic rulings and its explicit citation of Jubilees (CD 16:3–4) as evidence of a shared calendrical tradition tying it to Jubilees and to Enochic literature." } ], - "related_debate_ids": [], - "related_journey_ids": [], + "related_debate_ids": [ + "dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions", + "second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology" + ], + "related_journey_ids": [ + "canon-formation" + ], "related_difficult_passage_ids": [], "tags": [ "dead-sea-scrolls",