Building a final year project on the topic machine learning base classification of Emphysema from chest X-ray images #196088
Replies: 4 comments
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @OJ-tech542 , This is a great choice for a final year project. Medical image classification can feel overwhelming at first, but it gets much easier once you break the pipeline down. I actually worked on respiratory disease classification using deep learning, and the biggest piece of advice I can give you starting out is to skip building a custom CNN from scratch and leverage transfer learning right away. For chest X-rays, look into using DenseNet121 or VGG16 as your backbone architecture, initializing them with weights pretrained on ImageNet. DenseNet architectures are highly effective for medical imaging because their feature-reuse mechanism is excellent at capturing the subtle, diffuse structural variations typical of emphysema. You can pull these models directly from For your data, I'd highly recommend starting with a clean benchmark like the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset or looking up curated lung disease sets on Kaggle. To keep things manageable as a beginner, filter the dataset down to a clean binary classification task: Normal vs. Emphysema. When setting up your data pipeline, keep a few critical engineering steps in mind:
Lastly, since this is a final year project, review panels care immensely about model reliability. Once your binary classifier is training well, I strongly suggest implementing Grad-CAM. It generates a visual heatmap over the original X-ray, allowing you to audit whether the model is actually focusing on the lung fields or just picking up on edge artifacts, text labels, or scanner noise. I'd suggest setting up a notebook in Google Colab to take advantage of the free GPU, and focus your first week entirely on getting your images cleanly loaded into a PyTorch DataLoader or TensorFlow Dataset. Let me know when you get the data pipeline running, or if you run into any formatting bottlenecks early on. Good luck with the project! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @OJ-tech542, Good choice of topic medical image classification is a solid final year project, and it’s very doable if you break it down properly. Since you’re a beginner, I’d strongly suggest not trying to over-engineer anything at the start. Just focus on getting a working baseline first, then improve step by step. Here’s a practical way to approach it:
Before anything else, just make sure you’re comfortable with: basic Python For framework, either PyTorch or Keras is fine. If you’re unsure, Keras will get you moving faster.
Use something public like NIH ChestX-ray14 or Kaggle datasets. Keep it simple: Normal Don’t try multi-class yet. Also important: if the dataset has patient IDs, make sure you split by patient, not by image. Otherwise your accuracy will look fake.
Just use transfer learning. Good starting points: DenseNet121 (very common in medical imaging) Freeze most layers at first, just train the classifier head. Get something working before tuning anything.
You don’t need anything fancy: Adam optimizer If it overfits, worry about augmentation later.
Don’t just show accuracy that’s not enough for medical stuff. At minimum: confusion matrix Recall matters more because missing a sick patient is worse than a false alarm.
This is a nice “bonus” that examiners usually like. It helps show: “the model is actually looking at lung regions, not random artifacts” Not mandatory, but it makes your project look more serious.
If you want extra marks, wrap it in something simple: Streamlit is easiest Flow: Reality check The hardest part of this project is usually not the model it’s: dataset cleaning A simple model that is correct is way better than a complex one you can’t explain. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@OJ-tech542 Both answers above nailed the technical side. Since this is final year, here's what examiners actually dock marks for: 1. The "why this matters" section: Emphysema is underdiagnosed on X-rays. Your model isn't replacing radiologists - it's a triage tool for rural clinics. Say that. 2. Dataset license check: NIH ChestX-ray14 is public but read the usage terms. Some Kaggle datasets prohibit commercial use. Cite sources properly or you fail plagiarism checks. 3. Deploy in 10 min for demo day: pip install streamlit grad-cam torch |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
Body
I would like to be held by hand as a beginner on a step by step to building a project by myself on the topic machine learning base classification of Emphysema from chest X-ray images. the project is to develop a machine learning base classification of emphysema from chest X-ray images, train a machine learning model for emphysema detection.
Guidelines
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions