Skip to content

Make clear that lower priority numbers mean higher priority.#3713

Closed
berdt wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.6from
berdt:patch-1
Closed

Make clear that lower priority numbers mean higher priority.#3713
berdt wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.6from
berdt:patch-1

Conversation

@berdt

@berdt berdt commented Sep 23, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@the-knights-who-say-ni

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@serhiy-storchaka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please open an issue on the tracker for discussing your changes.

The PR should be for the master branch (unless this issue already is resolved in master).

@rhettinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm happy with the edit so I don't think a tracker issue is necessary.

Please do make the PR against the master branch and then label as a backport to 3.6

@berdt

berdt commented Sep 25, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I do not know how to do that so feel free to make the proper pull request yourself :)

@Mariatta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I made a PR on master based on this, with slightly adjusted wording.
I'll close this. Thanks :)

@Mariatta Mariatta closed this Nov 25, 2017
@Mariatta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

My PR is at #4556

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants