From 2f61dbfcea5825893cb2b649084ca89523019de9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ov2k Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:51:40 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. --- Doc/c-api/typeobj.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/c-api/typeobj.rst b/Doc/c-api/typeobj.rst index b8baa7c7dc39eef..dfe91ee358d0acf 100644 --- a/Doc/c-api/typeobj.rst +++ b/Doc/c-api/typeobj.rst @@ -2062,9 +2062,9 @@ This results in types that are limited relative to types defined in Python: :ref:`sub-interpreters `, so they should not include any subinterpreter-specific state. -Also, since :c:type:`PyTypeObject` is not part of the :ref:`stable ABI `, -any extension modules using static types must be compiled for a specific -Python minor version. +Also, since :c:type:`PyTypeObject` is only part of the :ref:`Limited API +` as an opaque struct, any extension modules using static types must be +compiled for a specific Python minor version. .. _heap-types: