PWGLF: latest version of findable study#6096
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ddobrigk
requested review from
BongHwi,
ChiaraDeMartin95,
alibuild,
chiarapinto,
ercolessi,
fmazzasc,
mbombara,
njacazio and
skundu692
as code owners
njacazio
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
hahassan7
pushed a commit
to hahassan7/O2Physics
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
* PWGLF: latest version of findable study * Please consider the following formatting changes (AliceO2Group#295) --------- Co-authored-by: ALICE Builder <alibuild@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@romainschotter this is the latest version of the findable study. Now it would be good if we somehow managed to complete the chain and move from findable to found and then finally to analysed: we could either add an "analysed" selection here or run your analysis task (for data) together or... even do both in case we would like to check the full consistency. Thanks a lot!