Skip to content

Correct smartem foil hole position registration - #852

Merged
d-j-hatton merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
smartem-foilhole-position-correction
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

Correct smartem foil hole position registration#852
d-j-hatton merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
smartem-foilhole-position-correction

Conversation

@d-j-hatton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Smartem needs the unscaled foil hole positions on the grid square image because it doesn't use a thumbnailed image. This wasn't happening as a side-effect of a mutation of the foil hole data in the function that inserts foil holes in ISPyB.

…tem insert needs to happen first as we want the foil hole positions on the full res image for that

preferrably we would untangle this a bit in the future so there is no implicit mutation of the data
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 54.36%. Comparing base (aac4779) to head (8770d8c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #852      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.57%   54.36%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files         104      104              
  Lines       11081    11204     +123     
  Branches     1471     1508      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits         6047     6091      +44     
- Misses       4714     4790      +76     
- Partials      320      323       +3     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@d-j-hatton
d-j-hatton merged commit a73c037 into main Aug 4, 2026
14 checks passed
@d-j-hatton
d-j-hatton deleted the smartem-foilhole-position-correction branch August 4, 2026 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants