$ command rsync --version
rsync version 3.4.1 protocol version 32
Copyright (C) 1996-2025 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: https://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 64-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, symlinks, symtimes, hardlinks, hardlink-specials,
hardlink-symlinks, IPv6, atimes, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs,
xattrs, optional secluded-args, iconv, prealloc, stop-at, no crtimes
Optimizations:
SIMD-roll, no asm-roll, openssl-crypto, no asm-MD5
Checksum list:
md5 md4 sha1 none
Compress list:
zlibx zlib none
Daemon auth list:
sha512 sha256 sha1 md5 md4
rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you
are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU
General Public Licence for details.
$ uname -a
Linux gentoo-zen2600 6.12.16-gentoo #3 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun May 25 13:18:45 CEST 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
$ lsblk
NAME MODEL PARTLABEL FSTYPE SIZE MOUNTPOINT
sda ST10000NT001-3LY101 9.1T
└─sda1 DM_integrity 9.1T
└─dm-integrity-sda1 linux_raid_member 9.1T
└─md0 xfs 18.2T /home/user/data
sdb ST10000NT001-3LY101 9.1T
└─sdb1 DM_integrity 9.1T
└─dm-integrity-sdb1 linux_raid_member 9.1T
└─md0 xfs 18.2T /home/user/data
sdc ST10000NT001-3LY101 9.1T
└─sdc1 DM_integrity 9.1T
└─dm-integrity-sdc1 linux_raid_member 9.1T
└─md0 xfs 18.2T /home/user/data
sdd ST10000NT001-3LY101 9.1T
└─sdd1 DM_integrity 9.1T
└─dm-integrity-sdd1 linux_raid_member 9.1T
└─md0 xfs 18.2T /home/user/data
sde LDLC 111.8G
├─sde1 2M
├─sde2 ext2 128M /boot
├─sde3 swap 8G [SWAP]
└─sde4 xfs 103.7G /
sdf HGST HUH728080ALE604 7.3T
└─sdf1 xfs 7.3T /home/user/mnt.sdf1
Hello, I got this strange behavior while filling my new RAID 6 from a backup (3.5" hard drive in USB 3 dock):
Versions and topology
I had always enabled
--sparsebefore that, to handle the occasional sparse file without thinking much of it. Any idea why? I can run further debug commands if needed.EDIT: wait, is this related to #319 ?
--sparsemay be very different from what I thought... if this is about finding holes by brute force instead of skipping holes known by the filesystem in sparse files, I suggest something to mention it in the manual and discourage it for most cases.