Is it full functional as JS sdk

[krishna1s]

I can see this is not documented on the official doc - https://opencode.ai/docs/sdk. Would like to build some functionality using opencode sdk, so just want to know if it support all existing functionality as JS sdk has

[manavy1998]

Did you get an answer to this?

[JayGhiya]

@adamdotdevin have usecase for using python sdk. any updates would be appreciated?

[sheldonhull]

I had copilot compare the js and python api.md and this is what I got from it, maybe you'll find useful. Since they use stainless for generation I figured it might be nearly identical and the comparison indicated most of this seems feature equivalent.

Based on posts on x from Dax, I think they are working on a v2 of the SDK so this might all improve/change in the near future as well.

---

Copilot analysis

Looking at both files, they're functionally equivalent. Same endpoints, same types, same methods. The differences are purely language conventions.

Summary: Both SDKs expose identical API surfaces. Every resource (Event, App, Find, File, Config, Session, Tui) has the same methods hitting the same HTTP endpoints. The type definitions mirror each other 1:1. Stainless did its job - these are the same API in two languages.

Aspect	Python SDK	JS SDK	Notes
Import style	from opencode_ai.types import ...	<a href="./src/resources/... ">	Language convention
Method params	**params	{ ...params }	kwargs vs object destructuring
Return type links	Full path ./src/opencode_ai/types/...	Short path ./src/resources/...	Directory structure difference
Type location	Separate types/ directory	Inline in resources/	Stainless config choice
Naming	snake_case (e.g., append_prompt)	camelCase (e.g., appendPrompt)	Language convention
Truncated lines	Several [...] truncations	None visible	Rendering issue in Python doc

The truncated lines in the Python api.md are a documentation artifact, not a feature gap. Both SDKs cover the same ground.