Skip to content

fix(session): respect model media capabilities - #41212

Closed
opencode-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
tool-media-caps
Closed

opencode-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
tool-media-caps

Conversation

@opencode-agent

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Prevents unsupported image and PDF attachments from remaining inside tool results and poisoning later history replay.

Media support now honors both capability representations: the legacy attachment flag and the modality-specific capabilities.input.image / pdf flags. If either representation enables the relevant medium, the model is treated as supporting it. Provider-specific rules still decide whether supported media can remain inside a tool result; otherwise it is routed through a synthetic user message.

The same compatibility rule is applied when unsupported user media is transformed, so legacy attachment configuration continues to work after extraction.

Verification

  • bun test ./test/session/message-v2.test.ts — 39 pass, 0 fail
  • Scoped oxlint — 0 errors (existing warnings only)
  • git diff --check
  • bun run typecheck was attempted twice but did not complete within the host timeout; it produced no diagnostics before timeout.

Requested by: @rekram1-node (Aiden Cline via Slack)

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated PR Cleanup

Thank you for contributing to opencode.

Due to the high volume of PRs from users and AI agents, we periodically close older PRs using automated criteria so maintainers can focus review time on the most active and community-supported contributions.

This PR was closed because it matched the following cleanup criteria:

  • The PR was created more than 1 month ago
  • The PR had fewer than 2 positive reactions
  • Positive reactions are counted as thumbs-up, heart, celebration, or rocket reactions on the PR

PRs created within the last month are not affected by this cleanup.

If you believe this PR was closed incorrectly, or if you are still actively working on it, please leave a comment explaining why it should be reopened. A maintainer can review and reopen it if appropriate.

Thanks again for taking the time to contribute.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant