fix(provider): bump Azure SDK to 3.0.93 - #47664
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue for this PR
Azure still uses its own OpenAI SDK 3.0.84 dependency, so the direct OpenAI SDK update does not update Azure's GPT-6 capability handling.
Type of change
What does this PR do?
Bumps
@ai-sdk/azurefrom3.0.88to3.0.93inopencodeandcore, bringing its OpenAI SDK to3.0.88, DeepSeek to2.0.50, and provider-utils to4.0.40.Only the two manifests and lockfile change. No source edits, dependency patches, or added tests. The extra gateway lock records preserve its existing dependency versions.
The audited release changes are:
onInputStartdocumentation update in provider-utils.azure.deepseek()factory; built-in OpenCode Azure routing does not call that factory.This intentionally retains upstream tier filtering. The new model-name parser fixes GPT-6-named deployments but also stops matching some old prefix-style deployment aliases; changing the filtering logic is left for a separate follow-up.
How did you verify your code works?
bun typecheck; frozen-lockfile install, formatting, and diff checks passed.Screenshots / recordings
Not applicable; no UI changes.
Checklist
Requested by: @rekram1-node (Aiden via Slack)