Skip to content

Security: apache/axis-axis2-java-core

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Threat Model — Apache Axis2/Java

Project Description

Apache Axis2/Java is a SOAP and REST web services engine. It provides a message-processing pipeline with pluggable transports (HTTP/HTTPS, JMS, TCP, local), a module system for cross-cutting concerns (WS-Security via Rampart, WS-Addressing), hot-deployment of service archives (AAR/MAR), and multi-protocol serving (JSON-RPC, REST/OpenAPI, MCP) from a single service deployment. It runs inside a Jakarta Servlet container (Tomcat, Jetty, WildFly) or embedded via Spring Boot.

Roles and Trust Levels

Role Trust Level Description
Server Administrator Fully trusted Configures axis2.xml, deploys/removes modules and services, controls the servlet container. Has filesystem and JVM-level access.
Service Deployer Trusted Drops AAR archives into WEB-INF/services/. May be the same person as the administrator, or a CI pipeline.
Module Developer Trusted Builds and deploys MAR module archives that add handlers to the processing pipeline. Code executes with full JVM privileges.
Authenticated Client Partially trusted A remote caller whose identity has been verified by the servlet container, a servlet filter, or a WS-Security module (Rampart). Authorized actions depend on the application.
Anonymous Client Untrusted A remote caller with no credentials. Can reach any endpoint exposed by the HTTP transport. All input is hostile.

Security Boundaries

What IS a security issue

  • Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the Axis2 framework itself — not through user-written service logic.
  • XML External Entity (XXE) injection — the framework's XML parsers resolve external entities or allow DOCTYPE declarations from untrusted input, enabling file read, SSRF, or denial of service.
  • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — an attacker causes the server to make requests to arbitrary internal or external hosts through framework features such as WSDL/XSD import resolution, endpoint references, or transport senders.
  • Deserialization of untrusted data — framework-level Java object deserialization that can be triggered by remote input without a class whitelist. This was historically the most severe class of vulnerability in Axis2 (see CVE history below).
  • Denial of Service via parser abuse — billion-laughs XML bombs, deeply nested JSON, or other input that causes unbounded memory or CPU consumption inside framework-level parsers.
  • Authentication or authorization bypass — a flaw in the handler/phase pipeline that allows a message to skip an engaged security module.
  • Information disclosure of server internals — stack traces, class names, or configuration details leaked to unauthenticated callers through fault messages or metadata endpoints when exposure has been disabled.
  • Path traversal — a crafted service name, URI component, or WSDL import location that allows reading or writing files outside expected directories.
  • Multipart/file upload abuse — unbounded file counts or sizes via multipart form data that exhaust server resources.

What is NOT a security issue

  • Vulnerabilities in user-written services. SQL injection, broken access control, or insecure business logic in a deployed service are the service author's responsibility.
  • Missing authentication on endpoints. Axis2 does not ship built-in authentication. Securing endpoints is the responsibility of the servlet container, servlet filters, or engaged security modules (Rampart).
  • Hot-deployment with weak filesystem permissions. If an attacker has write access to WEB-INF/services/ or WEB-INF/modules/, they can deploy arbitrary code. This is an OS/container configuration issue.
  • Service enumeration via /services/ listing. When exposeServiceMetadata is true (the default), service names are visible. This is documented behavior controllable via axis2.xml.
  • Denial of service at the network level. SYN floods, slowloris, or transport-layer attacks are mitigated by the servlet container, not Axis2.
  • Vulnerabilities within optional, external modules. For example, a flaw in Rampart's cryptographic implementation would be handled by the Rampart project. However, a flaw in Axis2's handler pipeline that allows the Rampart module to be bypassed is a vulnerability in Axis2.

Architecture and Attack Surface

Message Processing Pipeline

Remote Client (untrusted input)
    |
    v
Servlet Container (TLS termination, optional authentication)
    |
    v
AxisServlet / HTTPWorker              <-- HTTP entry point
    |
    v
MessageContext created                <-- request metadata captured
    |
    v
Transport-In Phase                    <-- transport-level handlers
    |
    v
Dispatchers                           <-- route to service/operation
  (URI, SOAPAction, WS-Addressing, JSON method, HTTP location)
    |
    v
Handler Phases                        <-- global + per-service handlers
  (security modules like Rampart execute here)
    |
    v
Message Builder                       <-- deserialize body
  (SOAP, XML, JSON, MTOM, multipart/form-data)
    |
    v
MessageReceiver                       <-- invoke service method
    |
    v
Response Phases + Transport-Out       <-- serialize response, send

URL Patterns

Axis2 exposes the following URL patterns from the servlet mapping:

Pattern Purpose Trust Requirement
/services/{ServiceName} JSON-RPC and SOAP service invocation Application-defined
/services/{ServiceName}/{Operation} REST-style per-operation invocation Application-defined
/services/{ServiceName}?wsdl WSDL metadata retrieval Anonymous (if exposeServiceMetadata=true)
/services/{ServiceName}?xsd XML Schema retrieval Anonymous (if exposeServiceMetadata=true)
/services/ Service listing Anonymous (if exposeServiceMetadata=true)
/services/{ServiceName}/{name}.xsd or .wsdl Packaged metadata by file name Anonymous (if exposeServiceMetadata=true)
/openapi.json OpenAPI 3.0 schema (if OpenAPI module engaged) Anonymous; per-service exposeServiceMetadata respected
/swagger-ui Swagger UI (if OpenAPI module engaged) Anonymous; per-service exposeServiceMetadata respected
/openapi-mcp.json MCP tool catalog (if OpenAPI module engaged) Anonymous; per-service exposeServiceMetadata respected

Attack Surface by Component

Component Threats Mitigations
XML parsers (AXIOM/StAX, DocumentBuilderFactory) XXE, billion laughs, entity expansion DoS DOCTYPE disallowed; external entities disabled; DefaultEntityResolver returns empty source
WSDL/XSD import resolution (wsdl4j, xmlschema-core) XXE in imported documents; SSRF via file:///gopher:// schemes SecureWSDLLocator pre-validates the client-side path with a hardened SAX parser (HTTP/HTTPS only, 10MB default, connect/read timeouts, relative-path SSRF bypass blocked); HardenedWSDLLocator screens the file, archive, classpath and catalog paths, refusing a DOCTYPE without restricting where a document may be loaded from
JSON parser (Gson) Deep nesting stack exhaustion, large payload DoS Fuzz-tested (1.7M+ iterations); Gson nesting limits
JSON-RPC dispatch Method name injection; unexpected operation invocation Method names validated against deployed operations; unknown methods return fault
Multipart/file upload (commons-fileupload2) Unbounded file count DoS (CVE-2023-24998 pattern); unbounded body size; temp-file accumulation commons-fileupload2 enforces the file count limit; multipartMaxRequestSize / multipartMaxFileSize bound the body; temp files are deleted immediately for form fields and tracked to collection for file parts
Form-urlencoded builder Unbounded body read into an in-memory map formUrlEncodedMaxRequestSize bounds the read; the stream fails rather than truncating
Service dispatchers Routing to unintended service; header spoofing; a service chosen from message content after the Security phase has already run Dispatchers validate service existence and unknown services return fault; selecting the service from the SOAP body namespace is off unless allowContentBasedServiceDispatch is set, so binding happens before the Security phase runs
Hot-deployment (DeploymentEngine) Malicious AAR/MAR deploys arbitrary code Trust boundary is filesystem access; no signature verification (admin operation)
Context externalization (SafeObjectInputStream) Java deserialization gadget chains No class allowlist is possible: the feature exists to carry application objects (self-managed data, Parameter values). Streams Axis2 creates refuse dynamic proxies and honour org.apache.axis2.context.externalize.serialFilter; no Axis2 path feeds them from the network, and an integrator who persists or replicates contexts must restrict the stream they own
Metadata endpoints (?wsdl, ?xsd, /services/, .xsd/.wsdl by name, OpenAPI/MCP) Service enumeration, schema disclosure exposeServiceMetadata enforced uniformly across the servlet and standalone HTTP paths and the OpenAPI/MCP generators
WS-Addressing response endpoints (wsa:ReplyTo, wsa:FaultTo) SSRF: an inbound header names the destination of a server-initiated send Non-anonymous response endpoints refused by default (allowNonAnonymousResponseEndpoints); when enabled, scheme restricted to HTTPS, destination screened at both the header-parsing and transport-selection layers, and redirects not followed
OpenAPI / Swagger UI surface Reflected XSS from request-controlled values; Host reflected into published URLs Host validated, values encoded for their output context, CSP with a per-response script nonce; the published servers[].url is relative unless openapi.serverBaseUrl pins it
MTOM/attachment handling Large attachment DoS, temp file exhaustion Streaming processing; TempFileManager cleanup
?fields= query parameter (field selection, if enabled) Reflection-based field filtering on response objects Field names validated against declared response type; no dynamic class loading

Transports

Transport Security Notes
HTTP/HTTPS TLS handled by servlet container. No framework-level auth. Primary production transport.
Local (in-JVM) No network exposure. JVM-level isolation only.
JMS Authentication delegated to JMS broker.
TCP Raw sockets. No encryption or authentication. Trusted networks only.
UDP No encryption, no authentication, no reliability. Trusted networks only.
Mail Depends on mail server authentication.

CVE History and Lessons Learned

Axis2's CVE history concentrates in three categories. The scan should weight these areas accordingly.

1. Deserialization of Untrusted Data (most severe)

Clustering module (removed): A previous version of Axis2 included a clustering module for multi-node coordination using Apache Tribes. This module exposed a network listener that deserialized Java objects from untrusted network streams without validation, enabling Remote Code Execution (RCE) via standard deserialization gadget chains. This affected all releases through 2.0.0 on Apache Tomcat, but only when the Tribes-based clustering feature was manually enabled (it was off by default). Assigned CVE-2026-66713 and resolved by complete removal of the clustering module in 40+ files (AXIS2-6097) in release 2.0.1.

Lesson: Any ObjectInputStream.readObject() on network input is a critical-severity finding. The remaining use of Java serialization in Axis2 is SafeObjectInputStream for context externalization. It has no class allowlist and cannot have one: the data it carries includes application objects by design. Nothing in Axis2 feeds it from the network -- see item 6 below for what it does enforce, and for what an integrator who persists contexts has to do themselves.

2. XML Parsing (XXE/SSRF)

CVE-2010-1632: DTD/XXE in MTOMBuilder flow. Fixed by strictly forbidding DOCTYPE declarations in SOAP and XML requests.

WSDL import parsing: wsdl4j 1.6.3 creates its own DocumentBuilderFactory without XXE hardening. Axis2 mitigates this with SecureWSDLLocator (pre-validates imported documents with a hardened SAX parser, rejects DOCTYPE, protocol-whitelists to HTTP/HTTPS, enforces size limits and timeouts) and hardened URI resolvers for xmlschema-core imports.

Lesson: Third-party XML libraries (wsdl4j, xmlschema-core) create their own parser factories that bypass framework-level hardening. Every XML parsing path — including transitive ones through dependency libraries — must be audited.

3. Dependency Vulnerabilities

CVE Dependency Issue Resolution
CVE-2010-3981 Admin console CSRF/XSS Fixed in 1.7.3
CVE-2012-6153, CVE-2014-3577 Apache HttpClient Various Updated dependency in 1.7.4
CVE-2016-1000031 commons-fileupload RCE via DiskFileItem Updated dependency in 1.7.6
CVE-2023-24998 commons-fileupload 1.x Unbounded file count DoS Migrated to commons-fileupload2 in 2.0.0

Lesson: Dependency-level CVEs are the most frequent class. The migration from commons-fileupload 1.x to commons-fileupload2 in 2.0.0 was specifically driven by CVE-2023-24998.

Existing Security Hardening

  1. XML parsing (scoped accurately in 2.0.2): The parser factories on the runtime paths disable DTDs and external entities: XMLUtils.newSecureDocumentBuilderFactory and XMLUtils.newDocument, SecureWSDLLocator, HardenedWSDLLocator, DefaultEntityResolver, and the SAAJ and JAX-WS conversions that were missed until 2.0.2 (XMLUtils.toDOM, SAAJUtil.toDOM, SOAPBodyImpl, LogicalMessageImpl, JAXWSRIWSDLGenerator).

    Earlier revisions of this document said all factories created by the framework. That was not true and is not a promise to make:

    • The code-generation tooling creates its own factories. Its dedicated entry points are hardened (see item 13 and XSD2Java), but the build-time emitters and schema generators are not audited here.
    • HbmXmlIntrospector allows DTDs deliberately, because hbm.xml files declare one. That is a permanent exception, not a gap.
    • TransformerFactory instances do not set ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD or ACCESS_EXTERNAL_STYLESHEET. Restricting them can break stylesheets that legitimately import, so it has not been done blind.
  2. WSDL import security (extended in 2.0.2): wsdl4j parses with its own unhardened parser and fetches the whole import chain itself, so every document has to be screened before it reaches wsdl4j.

    • SecureWSDLLocator screens the client-side path (createClientSideAxisService): protocol-restricted to HTTP/HTTPS, size-limited, timeout-protected, relative-path SSRF bypass patched.
    • HardenedWSDLLocator screens the paths that load a WSDL from a file, an archive, the classpath or a catalog, where an HTTP-only fetcher could not be used: JAX-WS WSDL loading, the runtime reload wrapper, the deployment builder's resolver path, and the codegen entry point. It refuses a DOCTYPE in the document or in anything it imports, bounds size and applies timeouts, but does not decide where a document comes from -- a delegate locator keeps its own resolution behaviour, and a bare relative path still loads, as wsdl4j accepts. Screening must not narrow what can be loaded, or it breaks ordinary deployments rather than attacks.
    • WSDL2Java probes an http location for a redirect before parsing it, and that probe is the hostile server's input, not the developer's. It now follows a redirect only from a 3xx status, only to http or https, and resolves a relative target against the document requested. It previously took Location from any response and used it verbatim, so a stray header on a 200 retargeted the tool and Location: file:///etc/passwd aimed the parse at the developer's own filesystem. A redirect elsewhere stops code generation rather than being ignored, so the tool cannot quietly parse a document other than the one named. Connect and read timeouts apply (axis2.codegen.wsdl.connect.timeout, axis2.codegen.wsdl.read.timeout).
    • Not screened: WSDL11ToAxisServiceBuilder.readInTheWSDLFile when no resolver is supplied parses the top document with the hardened XMLUtils.newDocument, but wsdl4j fetches any wsdl:import itself. The deployment callers do supply a resolver; a caller that does not, with a remote base URI, is outside what is screened.
  3. Schema import security: URI resolvers for AAR and WAR deployments refuse HTTP/HTTPS/FTP/JAR/file scheme resolution, so an import cannot reach the network or the server's filesystem through xmlschema-core's DefaultURIResolver; a location that is not absolute is looked up inside the archive.

    WSDLToAxisServiceBuilder installs a second, separate resolver where a caller supplied none, refusing every absolute schemaLocation -- file: included -- so that only a relative location resolves, against the WSDL's own base URI. Until 2.0.2 it classified with java.net.URI and swallowed URISyntaxException. URI enforces RFC 2396 and rejects a location holding a space, |, {, }, ^ or a backslash, while the java.net.URL the delegate builds accepts them, so such a location was never classified and was resolved as if relative -- the absolute remote fetch the guard exists to refuse, reached by being malformed. Classification is now textual (a scheme prefix, or a // network-path reference, which takes the base document's scheme) and cannot fail open. A relative name that URI also rejects, such as one containing a space, still resolves.

    file: was added to the guard in 2.0.2. Only AARBasedWSDLLocator had been letting one through: it counts file: as absolute, so an absolute file: import passed the scheme check and fell through to the parent resolver. In the other three the predicate does not count file: as absolute, so such a location was already treated as an archive resource name and never opened a filesystem path.

  4. Deserialization of externalized contexts (2.0.2): There is no class allowlist, and one cannot be shipped: context externalization exists to carry application objects -- SelfManagedDataHolder holds whatever a service put there, and a Parameter value may be any serializable object -- so a list of Axis2's own context classes would refuse the data the feature is for. Earlier revisions of this document claimed such an allowlist; it never existed. What holds without knowing the application's types:

    • The streams Axis2 creates refuse dynamic proxies. Axis2 never writes one, and a proxy over an attacker-chosen invocation handler is the entry point of the classic gadget chains. Override with org.apache.axis2.context.externalize.allowProxies=true.
    • org.apache.axis2.context.externalize.serialFilter takes a JEP 290 pattern applied to those streams only, for an integrator who does know their own types. An unparseable pattern, or one defining no filter, is an error rather than a silent no-op. The JVM-wide jdk.serialFilter applies as well.
    • Not covered: where the writer chose object form, SafeObjectInputStream calls readObject() on the ObjectInput its caller supplied. That stream belongs to the caller and has already read objects by then, so no filter can be installed on it. Restricting it is the caller's to do.

    No Axis2 code path feeds these streams from the network. The risk arrives when an integrator persists or replicates contexts, and deserializing attacker-influenced bytes stays dangerous whatever is configured here.

  5. Clustering removed: The entire clustering module (Tribes-based inter-node communication with unvalidated deserialization) has been removed from the codebase.

  6. File upload limits: Migration to commons-fileupload2 enforces file count limits, preventing CVE-2023-24998-style DoS.

  7. Fault detail suppression: sendStacktraceDetailsWithFaults defaults to false.

  8. Fuzz testing: Jazzer-based fuzzers cover XML, JSON, HTTP header, and URL parsers. 45M+ iterations with zero crashes or security findings. See src/site/xdoc/docs/OSS-FUZZ.md. Axis2/C has an active OSS-Fuzz integration.

  9. WS-Addressing response endpoints (2.0.2): A non-anonymous wsa:ReplyTo or wsa:FaultTo makes the server open a connection to an address the caller chose. Unless WS-Security is engaged to bind that endpoint reference to a trusted issuer, the WS-Addressing specification leaves it to the receiver to decide whether to honour it, so Axis2 now declines by default. allowNonAnonymousResponseEndpoints is false; replies and faults travel back down the inbound connection only. Apache CXF made the same choice in org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.decoupled.enabled.

    Deployments that genuinely use decoupled responses — the separate-listener "Dual" clients, or a third-party callback endpoint — set it to true, and should also set httpFrontendHostUrl so the generated reply address is the real external URL rather than the local one. With the feature enabled:

    • allowedResponseEndpointSchemes permits HTTPS only. Widen it to name a transport actually used for replies.
    • The destination is screened both where the inbound header is parsed and where a server-side response acquires its transport, so the check cannot be reached around by setting the endpoint reference another way.
    • Link-local, wildcard and multicast destinations are always refused. blockPrivateNetworkResponseEndpoints additionally refuses loopback and private ranges; it is off by default because a callback inside the same private network is how most decoupled deployments are wired.
    • The address checks are address-family agnostic: a bracketed IPv6 literal is classified, not treated as an unrecognised host, and the IPv4-mapped form ([::ffff:169.254.169.254]) is refused as the address it reaches rather than as a separate spelling. IPv6 unique-local (fc00::/7) is covered explicitly, since InetAddress.isSiteLocalAddress answers only for the deprecated fec0::/10.
    • Redirects are not followed, so a reply endpoint cannot hand the sender a destination the policy already refused.
    • Name resolution is bounded (responseEndpointResolveTimeoutMillis) and runs on a capped pool, so a slow resolver cannot tie up request threads.

    Known limitation: the destination is resolved once to check it and again to connect, so a hostile DNS server could answer differently the second time. Closing that requires connecting to a pinned address, which the transport does not currently support. Operators in cloud environments should pair these settings with network egress controls.

  10. Request body ceilings (2.0.2): The message builders read the transport stream directly, so a servlet container's post-size limit never sees the body. multipartMaxRequestSize and multipartMaxFileSize (100 MB), formUrlEncodedMaxRequestSize (2 MB), mtomMaxRequestSize (100 MB, the whole multipart/related body, so MTOM and SwA) and soapMaxRequestSize (100 MB, a plain SOAP or POX body) bound them; -1 restores the previous unbounded behaviour, and any may be set per service.

    Every builder that reads the stream has to be bounded, not just the ones whose limits were reported: the caller picks which builder runs by choosing the Content-Type, so a ceiling on the form builders alone is avoided by sending multipart/related instead. Multipart temp files are now deleted rather than accumulating: form-field parts as soon as their text is read, file parts once the item backing the DataHandler is unreachable.

    Both ceilings are enforced against bytes actually read, not against a declared Content-Length, so a chunked request body is bounded on the same terms as a declared one. This is worth stating because the reverse is the easy mistake: a limit that screens the header before the read is no limit at all for Transfer-Encoding: chunked, which declares no length. The form-urlencoded builder wraps the stream in BoundedInputStream; the multipart path relies on commons-fileupload2, which pairs its Content-Length fast path with a streaming guard.

  11. OpenAPI and Swagger UI output (2.0.2): Request-controlled values are validated and encoded for the context they are written into, the served page carries a Content-Security-Policy with a per-response script nonce, and the published servers[].url is relative — resolved by the client against wherever it fetched the document — rather than derived from the request Host. openapi.serverBaseUrl pins an absolute URL where a deployment needs one.

  12. Uniform metadata exposure (2.0.2): exposeServiceMetadata is now honoured by every anonymous metadata route: the ?wsdl, ?wsdl2 and ?xsd queries as before, plus the .xsd/.wsdl file routes on both the servlet and standalone HTTP paths, the named-WSDL route, the OpenAPI/Swagger/MCP generators, the /services/ listing on both render paths, WS-MEX GetMetadata, and the ping module's service-level ping. A service with exposure disabled is skipped rather than refused, so it stays indistinguishable from one that is not deployed.

    The gate is AxisService.isMetadataExposed(). It lives in the kernel because modules answer anonymous metadata requests too and cannot reach a transport's private copy of the check -- which is how the listing, WS-MEX and ping came to be exempt from a control the query routes enforced.

    Separately, the ?xsd= route reaches a service's packaged META-INF with the request's value, and that directory holds services.xml, whose parameters name keystores and password-callback classes. Only schema and WSDL documents are servable, and only from the queried service's own archive: the lookup uses URLClassLoader.findResource, which does not delegate, so a name cannot reach a META-INF resource in an unrelated jar further up the chain -- Axis2's own jars, WEB-INF/lib, or the container's shared libraries. That is the AXIS2-5846 rule, and in 2.0.2 it holds on every route: AxisService.printXSD and printWSDL2 had kept using getResourceAsStream, which delegates parent-first, so the ?xsd= and ?wsdl2= queries searched the whole hierarchy while the file routes did not. Both rules now live in one kernel helper, MetaInfResources, which the transport delegates to, because two copies of this check are what let the two routes drift apart in the first place.

    A classloader that is not a URLClassLoader cannot be searched without delegating, so this route serves nothing there rather than serving too much. Deployed archives always get a DeploymentClassLoader, which is one; an embedder building an AxisService against some other classloader loses this route and keeps every other way of publishing a schema.

    A hidden service is answered exactly as an undeployed one, on every route, body included: the query routes no longer send 403 where an absent service gets 404, which was an existence oracle. There is no 403 left in either HTTP path's metadata handling. RFC 9110 section 15.5.4 sanctions answering 404 to conceal a forbidden resource's existence, which is what this does.

  13. Content-based service dispatch (2.0.2): The inflow phase order is Transport, Addressing, Security, PreDispatch, Dispatch, and DispatchPhase installs only the phases that follow it, so a service bound during Dispatch is bound after the Security phase has run against no service and Security is never revisited. Selecting a service from the namespace of the SOAP body's first element therefore let a caller whose request URI named no service reach a service whose engaged security modules had not run for it. allowContentBasedServiceDispatch defaults to false. Dispatch by request URI, SOAPAction and WS-Addressing binds the service before the Security phase and is unaffected.

  14. Generated endpoint addresses depend on deployment configuration (documentation, 2.0.2): Set httpFrontendHostUrl in axis2.xml -- or an explicit port parameter on the servlet transport -- for any deployment whose published WSDL is consumed by others. Neither is set by default, and without them AxisServlet autodetects its port from the first request after startup and keeps it for the lifetime of the process. In a standard container getServerPort() derives from the client's Host header, so the first caller after a deployment or restart decides the port written into the soap:address and EPRs served to every later client. The host part is taken per request and reflects only to the requester; the port is shared state.

    This is not fixed in code. Reading the actual listening port instead would return the back-end port and publish a wrong address for every deployment behind a TLS-terminating proxy, which is the common case, and deriving the port per request means changing TransportListener.getEPRsForService, which ListenerManager also calls at startup with no request in scope. Configure the front-end URL; it is the only answer that is correct for both.

Reporting Security Issues

Report vulnerabilities to: security@apache.org

Follow the Apache Security Policy. All confirmed issues go through coordinated disclosure with CVE assignment.

There aren't any published security advisories