[CI] use version 19 of clang-tools in cpp-linter-action

[zhjwpku]

cpp-linter-action use version 14 clang-tools by default [0], while working on #40, cpp-linter-action complains about the format, I use clang-format@19 on my mac(installed by brew install clang-format), so I installed llvm@14 formula, it gives the following difference:

template <class T, class E>
 inline constexpr bool is_expected_copy_assignable_v =
-    is_copy_assignable_or_void_v<T> && is_copy_constructible_or_void_v<T> &&
-    std::is_copy_assignable_v<E> && std::is_copy_constructible_v<E> &&
+    is_copy_assignable_or_void_v<T>&& is_copy_constructible_or_void_v<T>&&
+        std::is_copy_assignable_v<E>&& std::is_copy_constructible_v<E> &&
     (is_nothrow_move_constructible_or_void_v<T> ||
      std::is_nothrow_move_constructible_v<E>);
 
 // LWG-4026
 template <class T, class E>
 inline constexpr bool is_expected_trivially_copy_assignable_v =
-    is_trivially_copy_constructible_or_void_v<T> &&
-    is_trivially_copy_assignable_or_void_v<T> && is_trivially_destructible_or_void_v<T> &&
-    std::is_trivially_copy_constructible_v<E> && std::is_trivially_copy_assignable_v<E> &&
-    std::is_trivially_destructible_v<E>;
+    is_trivially_copy_constructible_or_void_v<T>&& is_trivially_copy_assignable_or_void_v<
+        T>&& is_trivially_destructible_or_void_v<T>&&
+        std::is_trivially_copy_constructible_v<E>&&
+            std::is_trivially_copy_assignable_v<E>&& std::is_trivially_destructible_v<E>;
 

+ is version 14 while - is version 19, IMHO, version 19 seems better, so I propose adding a version: 19 to cpp-linter config, I've include this in #40. I can change back to version 14 format if we agree this is a bad idea.

[0] https://cpp-linter.github.io/cpp-linter-action/inputs-outputs/#version

[zhjwpku]

This was done in merged PR #40, so closed.