fix(python): classify invalid default selectors - #206
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 9, 2026
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #205.\n\nMind production-harness replay exposed that the default pytest runner classified an explicit zero-match target as
env-blocked (unknown). Because that diagnostic included transient uv/JUnit paths, identical recorded model behavior produced a different follow-up prompt in a fresh workspace.\n\nThis recognizes pytest zero-match signals before generic environment classification, emits the existing typedno-tests-matched-selectorscontract with stable detail, and proves the exact invalid-target case through the real uv/pytest runner.\n\nVerification:\n-go test ./runners/python -count=1\n-go vet ./runners/python\n-git diff --check