fix: restore missing managed template files - #55
Merged
Conversation
dapi
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 14, 2026 01:46
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
pull --asknow explicitly offers restoring a missing user-owned path from the canonical template.overwriteorrestorechoice recreates the file and records it asmanaged.Why
A legacy lock can mark a root-level template asset as user-owned even after it was removed locally. Previously
pullcould only report a conflict; it could not restore the canonical asset through its interactive resolver.Validation
mise exec go@1.21.13 -- go test ./internal/ownershipmise exec go@1.21.13 -- go vet ./...git diff --checkNote:
go test ./internal/cliis blocked locally before test execution by the hostdyld: missing LC_UUID load commanderror.