Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential bug: Adding a non-existent integration causes an unhandled `ModuleNotFoundError` in `iter_default_integrations`, crashing applications during `sentry_sdk.init()`.
Description: The
iter_default_integrationsfunction attempts to importsentry_sdk.integrations.unraisablehook.UnraisablehookIntegration, which does not exist in the codebase. This action triggers aModuleNotFoundError. Thetry...exceptblock within the function is not configured to catch this specific exception, as it only handlesDidNotEnableandSyntaxError. As a result, the unhandledModuleNotFoundErrorwill propagate up the call stack during SDK initialization (sentry_sdk.init()), causing any application using the SDK with default settings to crash on startup.Suggested fix: Add
ModuleNotFoundErrorto theexceptclause in theiter_default_integrationsfunction. This will ensure that attempting to load a non-existent integration is gracefully handled by logging a debug message and continuing, which matches the intended behavior for other integration loading failures.severity: 0.9, confidence: 0.98
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.