Skip to content

C++: Update test results after extractor changes #21853

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jketema merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2026
Merged

C++: Update test results after extractor changes #21853

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/taint-tests/localTaint.expected
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4928,6 +4928,8 @@ WARNING: module 'TaintTracking' has been deprecated and may be removed in future
| stl.h:95:69:95:69 | x | stl.h:96:42:96:42 | x | |
| stl.h:96:42:96:42 | ref arg x | stl.h:95:69:95:69 | x | |
| stl.h:96:42:96:42 | ref arg x | stl.h:95:69:95:69 | x | |
| stl.h:292:30:292:40 | 0 | file://:0:0:0:0 | noexcept(...) | TAINT |
| stl.h:292:30:292:40 | 0 | file://:0:0:0:0 | noexcept(...) | TAINT |

@geoffw0 geoffw0 May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this flow represent - in particular where does the 0 come from? Line 292 is:

vector() noexcept(noexcept(Allocator())) : vector(Allocator()) { }

@jketema jketema May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing. This code is never executed. I'd say this is a bug in the old dataflow library.

@geoffw0 geoffw0 May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, this is just a case where the extractor is extracting more (or something like that) and exposing existing issues.

@jketema jketema May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct.

| stl.h:292:30:292:40 | call to allocator | stl.h:292:21:292:41 | noexcept(...) | TAINT |
| stl.h:292:30:292:40 | call to allocator | stl.h:292:21:292:41 | noexcept(...) | TAINT |
| stl.h:292:30:292:40 | call to allocator | stl.h:292:21:292:41 | noexcept(...) | TAINT |
Expand Down
Loading