C++: Split DataFlow::Node.asExpr into two predicates#774
Merged
Conversation
As we prepare to clarify how conversions are treated, we don't want a `sink(...)` declaration where it's non-obvious which conversions are applied to arguments.
With this change, the `IRDataflowTestCommon.qll` and `DataflowTestCommon.qll` files use the same definitions of sources and sinks. Since the IR data flow library is meant to be compatible with the AST data flow library, this is what we ought to be testing. Two alerts change but not necessarily for the right reasons.
The existing `Node.asExpr` predicate changes semantics so it becomes the one that most users should use when they don't want to think about `Conversion`s. A new `Node.asConvertedExpr` predicate is added and has the same semantics as the old `Node.asExpr` predicate. It's for advanced users that know about `Conversion`s and want to account for them.
dave-bartolomeo
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2019
dave-bartolomeo
left a comment
dave-bartolomeo
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, I think I agree that this is better than the status quo. I'm still uneasy about how this seems to blur the line between a reference and the referred-to object, but I think it's best to have that discussion once we've figured out what the new interface for pointer vs. pointee should be.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is my starting point for resolving https://jira.semmle.com/browse/CPP-318 (see also #597 (comment)). I expect we'll have to iterate for a few rounds to reach a compromise that satisfies all use cases, but I think this is better than the status quo.
In the 3rd commit I've implemented the most extreme of the proposals we've discussed on #597, yet it doesn't affect the test results. That means we need better test cases. Can you come up with a realistic test to show that this change leads to too much data flow?
I hope we agree on the following.
DataFlowshould not have to know or worry aboutConversions. They will set sources and sinks to unconverted expressions and expect the library to Do What They Mean.Conversions for sources and sinks.asExpr, which should err on the side of too much data flow.