-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
test: verify read_gbq_colab label preservation in anywidget display mode #17887
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+33
−1
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d0b590e
fix: preserve read_gbq_colab label in anywidget mode
shuoweil dc53247
Update packages/bigframes/bigframes/session/_io/bigquery/__init__.py
shuoweil a8a07ba
test: skip anywidget test when dependencies missing
shuoweil c563483
Merge branch 'main' into shuowei-sql-cell-track
shuoweil 9185cdd
test(bigframes): verify read_gbq_colab label preservation in anywidge…
shuoweil File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-rhetorical question: do we need this line of change? It alters the behavior of the original code, which alters the original list that was passed in at line 73.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this shallow copy is intentional as a safety guard. There are two reasons. (1) at line 73, del api_methods[0]
removes the primary API label. Creating a copy ensures this deletion stys local to the helper function and does not mutate the caller's original list if reused or logs elsewhere.
(2) api_methods may sometime pass in tuple. We have a unit test reate_job_configs_labels(labels, ("read_gbq_colab", "head")) will pass tuples to label. In this case, tuple is immutable. This copy is a guard to avoid errors for del api_methods[0].