make conversion non-destructive to soup; improve div/article/section handling - #184
Merged
chrispy-snps merged 4 commits intoFeb 4, 2025
Conversation
…handling Signed-off-by: chrispy <chrispy@synopsys.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
@jsm28 - I am interested in your feedback on this pull request, if you have time. |
AlexVonB
reviewed
Feb 4, 2025
AlexVonB
left a comment
AlexVonB
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Love the idea of not changing the soup object!
Contributor
|
I agree that paragraph separation is appropriate for these three tags. |
This was referenced Feb 17, 2025
Wuhall
pushed a commit
to Wuhall/python-markdownify
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
…handling (matthewwithanm#184) Signed-off-by: chrispy <chrispy@synopsys.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This merge request does the following:
convert_soup()non-destructive (soup left as-is)<div>,<article>,<section>elementsUnit tests are updated.
Regarding #107, I believe that block-element newline separation, not line continuation, is the correct behavior at
<div>,<article>, and<section>elements. These elements are all block elements. The following HTML example shows that in both the<p>and<div>cases, the separation between "foo" and "bar" uses block-element separation behavior, not<br />line-continuation behavior: