The creation of file without extension and no contentType (foo/bar) returns foo/bar should be foo/bar$.bin.
This as been introduced since PR #1336 (mp3$.mp3)
A PR is on-the-go for the foo/bar$bin solution
@jaxoncreed @RubenVerborgh
what is the good response ?
foo/bar$.bin
- refuse to create
- create but with an other name :
foo/bar.bin
Actually you can delete existing foo/bar (tested) even if they coexist with foo/bar$.ttl or foo/bar$.bin
In general foo/bar with contentType is created as foo/bar$.ext (ext from contentType) is that correct ? It as some importance because foo/bar can be the name of a folder foo/bar/
(databrowser display both bar as folder with folder contents if foo/bar/ has contents, it is a bug)
`
The creation of file without extension and no contentType (
foo/bar) returnsfoo/barshould befoo/bar$.bin.This as been introduced since PR #1336 (mp3$.mp3)
A PR is on-the-go for the
foo/bar$bin solution@jaxoncreed @RubenVerborgh
what is the good response ?
foo/bar$.binfoo/bar.binActually you can delete existing foo/bar (tested) even if they coexist with foo/bar$.ttl or foo/bar$.bin
In general foo/bar with contentType is created as
foo/bar$.ext(ext from contentType) is that correct ? It as some importance becausefoo/barcan be the name of a folderfoo/bar/(databrowser display both
baras folder with folder contents iffoo/bar/ has contents, it is a bug)`