docs(benchmarks): qualify typed-reply source evidence [sc-2866] - #604
Merged
Conversation
The next source-family qualification attempt reproduces the archived kickoff-prompt resend, but withholds a clean repair label. The repaired extractor matches all 12 selected controls; a separate controlled run of the unmodified send function saves a hidden continuation before dispatch, at which point extraction already excludes the pending reply. Full application recovery remains unresolved, so these helper checks cannot certify a clean whole change. This adds a sanitized readout and receipt, a benchmark navigation link, and a native-CLI decision note for sc-2866. Exact source/claims and executable controls remain private. All 14 archive preimages match the selected source parent and the diff reconstructs byte-identically; 29 repair-source files are blob-verified. Historical unchanged context and the complete staged/capture roster are not authenticated. The incident retains its earlier scale-probe exposure. Validation: 12 extractor cases across three variants (original, explicit partial adaptation, source repair); controlled persistence-before-dispatch observation plus healthy continuation; current native census (3 chunks / 10 tasks, zero judge calls); 60 private hashes, source bindings, recorded outcomes, 28 local links and preserved decision-history bytes verified. Benchmark tracker and ship gates are reported below when complete. No full product suite is needed for this documentation-only delivery. Zero corpus admissions, qualified clean pairs, reviewer benchmark calls, score changes or production behavior changes. Parent sc-2832 remains open; the readout records the precise recovery/provenance questions required for reassessment. Shortcut: https://app.shortcut.com/benordlabs/story/2866
Contributor
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR adds a source qualification report for sc-2866, documents its controls and unresolved delivery boundary, records reproduction and census procedures, and links the findings from benchmark documentation. ChangesSource qualification
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change adds documentation for an unresolved source-qualification investigation and links it into benchmark records. It does not alter application behavior, benchmark scores, or production data, and is ready to merge. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The next source-family qualification attempt reproduces the archived kickoff-prompt resend, but withholds a clean repair label. The repaired extractor matches all 12 selected controls; a separate controlled run of the unmodified send function saves a hidden continuation before dispatch, at which point extraction already excludes the pending reply. Full application recovery remains unresolved, so these helper checks cannot certify a clean whole change.
This adds a sanitized readout and receipt, a benchmark navigation link, and a native-CLI decision note for sc-2866. Exact source/claims and executable controls remain private. All 14 archive preimages match the selected source parent and the diff reconstructs byte-identically; 29 repair-source files are blob-verified. Historical unchanged context and the complete staged/capture roster are not authenticated. The incident retains its earlier scale-probe exposure.
Validation: 12 extractor cases across three variants (original, explicit partial adaptation, source repair); controlled persistence-before-dispatch observation plus healthy continuation; current native census (3 chunks / 10 tasks, zero judge calls); 60 private hashes, source bindings, recorded outcomes, 28 local links and preserved decision-history bytes verified. Benchmark tracker, decision integrity, and all blocking devkit ship reviewer/completeness gates pass. CI is pending. No full product suite is needed for this documentation-only delivery.
Zero corpus admissions, qualified clean pairs, reviewer benchmark calls, score changes or production behavior changes. Parent sc-2832 remains open; the readout records the precise recovery/provenance questions required for reassessment.
Shortcut: https://app.shortcut.com/benordlabs/story/2866
Summary by CodeRabbit