[doc] socket.getfqdn docs are not explicit enough about the algorithm.

[bitdancer]

BPO	16652
Nosy	@bitdancer, @iritkatriel, @akulakov

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2012-12-09.21:44:41.517>
labels = ['3.11', 'type-bug', '3.9', '3.10', 'docs']
title = '[doc] socket.getfqdn docs are not explicit enough about the algorithm.'
updated_at = <Date 2021-11-30.23:23:42.190>
user = 'https://github.com/bitdancer'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2021-11-30.23:23:42.190>
actor = 'iritkatriel'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2012-12-09.21:44:41.517>
creator = 'r.david.murray'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 16652
keywords = []
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['177236', '223119', '407408']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['r.david.murray', 'docs@python', 'iritkatriel', 'andrei.avk']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue16652'
versions = ['Python 3.9', 'Python 3.10', 'Python 3.11']

Linked PRs

• gh-60856: Be explicit about localhost for socket.getfqdn #93451

[bitdancer]

From the docs it isn't quite clear if getfqnd() does the equivalent of:

  gethostbyaddr('127.0.0.1')

or

  gethostbyaddr(gethostbyname(gethostname()))

It matters which it is, when debugging a host's name configuration and DNS server problems.

[BreamoreBoy]

I'm assuming that this still needs doing.

[iritkatriel]

There was a recent update nearby in bpo-40635 by Andrei, but I think it doesn't quite cover this issue.