visit_reachable: replace release-mode test with an assert. - #16866
Merged
Conversation
It should be impossible for an untracked object to have the collecting flag set. Back when state was stored in gc_refs, it obviously was impossible (gc_refs couldn't possibly have a positive & negative value simultaneously). While the _implementation_ of "state" has gotten much more complicated, it's still _logically_ just as impossible.
methane
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2019
jacobneiltaylor
pushed a commit
to jacobneiltaylor/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2019
…16866) It should be impossible for an untracked object to have the collecting flag set. Back when state was stored in gc_refs, it obviously was impossible (gc_refs couldn't possibly have a positive & negative value simultaneously). While the _implementation_ of "state" has gotten much more complicated, it's still _logically_ just as impossible.
shihai1991
pushed a commit
to shihai1991/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2020
…16866) It should be impossible for an untracked object to have the collecting flag set. Back when state was stored in gc_refs, it obviously was impossible (gc_refs couldn't possibly have a positive & negative value simultaneously). While the _implementation_ of "state" has gotten much more complicated, it's still _logically_ just as impossible.
oraluben
pushed a commit
to oraluben/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
…16866) It should be impossible for an untracked object to have the collecting flag set. Back when state was stored in gc_refs, it obviously was impossible (gc_refs couldn't possibly have a positive & negative value simultaneously). While the _implementation_ of "state" has gotten much more complicated, it's still _logically_ just as impossible.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It should be impossible for an untracked object to have the collecting
flag set. Back when state was stored in gc_refs, it obviously was
impossible (gc_refs couldn't possibly have a positive & negative value
simultaneously). While the implementation of "state" has gotten much
more complicated, it's still logically just as impossible.