bpo-29275: Remove Y2K reference from time module docs#17321
Merged
Conversation
…version The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid.
benjaminp
reviewed
Nov 22, 2019
These are likely no longer needed as the paragraph now no longer refers to them directly as topics.
Contributor
|
Thanks @CallumQuick for the PR, and @benjaminp for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2019
…H-17321) The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid. (cherry picked from commit 42bc60e) Co-authored-by: Callum Ward <wards.callum@gmail.com>
|
GH-17348 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
|
GH-17349 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2019
…H-17321) The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid. (cherry picked from commit 42bc60e) Co-authored-by: Callum Ward <wards.callum@gmail.com>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2019
The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid. (cherry picked from commit 42bc60e) Co-authored-by: Callum Ward <wards.callum@gmail.com>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2019
The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid. (cherry picked from commit 42bc60e) Co-authored-by: Callum Ward <wards.callum@gmail.com>
pganssle
reviewed
Nov 23, 2019
pganssle
left a comment
pganssle
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bit late to the game, but thanks for this PR!
Hopefully this doesn't result in some weird box-checking certification process deciding that we're no longer Y2K compliant 😄.
jacobneiltaylor
pushed a commit
to jacobneiltaylor/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2019
…H-17321) The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid.
shihai1991
pushed a commit
to shihai1991/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2020
…H-17321) The Y2K reference is not needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:`strptime` is still valid.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Y2K reference is no longer needed as it only points out that Python's use of C standard functions doesn't generally suffer from Y2K issues; the point regarding conventions for conversion of 2-digit years in :func:
strptimeis still valid.Some advice on what indexes to add/remove would be appreciated alongside review.
https://bugs.python.org/issue29275