bpo-42163, bpo-42189, bpo-42659: Support uname_tuple._replace (for all but processor)#23010
Merged
Conversation
jaraco
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
jaraco
changed the title
Member
Author
|
@serhiy-storchaka Would you be willing to take another pass? |
github-actions
Bot
removed
the
stale
Member
Author
|
Rather than let it go stale again, I'm just going to merge. |
|
@jaraco: Please replace |
Contributor
|
Thanks @jaraco for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9. |
Contributor
|
Sorry @jaraco, I had trouble checking out the |
jaraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2021
…for all but processor) (GH-23010) * Add test capturing missed expectation with uname_result._replace. * bpo-42163: Override uname_result._make to allow uname_result._replace to work (for everything but 'processor'. * Replace hard-coded length with one derived from the definition. * Add test capturing missed expectation with copy/deepcopy on namedtuple (bpo-42189). * bpo-42189: Exclude processor parameter when constructing uname_result. * In _make, rely on __new__ to strip processor. * Add blurb. * iter is not necessary here. * Rely on num_fields in __new__ * Add test for slices on uname * Add test for copy and pickle. Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> * import pickle * Fix equality test after pickling. * Simply rely on __reduce__ for pickling. Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a6fd0f4) Co-authored-by: Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com>
|
GH-24232 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
jaraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2021
…for all but processor) (GH-23010) (#24232) * Add test capturing missed expectation with uname_result._replace. * bpo-42163: Override uname_result._make to allow uname_result._replace to work (for everything but 'processor'. * Replace hard-coded length with one derived from the definition. * Add test capturing missed expectation with copy/deepcopy on namedtuple (bpo-42189). * bpo-42189: Exclude processor parameter when constructing uname_result. * In _make, rely on __new__ to strip processor. * Add blurb. * iter is not necessary here. * Rely on num_fields in __new__ * Add test for slices on uname * Add test for copy and pickle. Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> * import pickle * Fix equality test after pickling. * Simply rely on __reduce__ for pickling. Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a6fd0f4) Co-authored-by: Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com>
adorilson
pushed a commit
to adorilson/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2021
…l but processor) (python#23010) * Add test capturing missed expectation with uname_result._replace. * bpo-42163: Override uname_result._make to allow uname_result._replace to work (for everything but 'processor'. * Replace hard-coded length with one derived from the definition. * Add test capturing missed expectation with copy/deepcopy on namedtuple (bpo-42189). * bpo-42189: Exclude processor parameter when constructing uname_result. * In _make, rely on __new__ to strip processor. * Add blurb. * iter is not necessary here. * Rely on num_fields in __new__ * Add test for slices on uname * Add test for copy and pickle. Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> * import pickle * Fix equality test after pickling. * Simply rely on __reduce__ for pickling. Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://bugs.python.org/issue42163
https://bugs.python.org/issue42189
https://bugs.python.org/issue42659
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:jaraco