Skip to content

[3.10] docs: use 'recursively' in the description of rglob, and mention globs in the os equivalences (GH-94954)#95071

Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-6e2fbda-3.10
Closed

[3.10] docs: use 'recursively' in the description of rglob, and mention globs in the os equivalences (GH-94954)#95071
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-6e2fbda-3.10

Conversation

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The r in rglob stands for "recursively", so use the word in the description. Also, glob and rglob can usefully be mentioned as the pathlib equivalent of os.walk.

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon
(cherry picked from commit 6e2fbda)

Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder ned@nedbatchelder.com

…s in the os equivalences (pythonGH-94954)

The r in `rglob` stands for "recursively", so use the word in the description. Also, glob and rglob can usefully be mentioned as the pathlib equivalent of os.walk.

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon
(cherry picked from commit 6e2fbda)

Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@brettcannon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The backport failed to 3.11, so to keep things relatively in-sync, I'm going to close this.

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-6e2fbda-3.10 branch January 2, 2026 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants