Skip to content

[3.10] gh-95300: Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217)#96267

Merged
miss-islington merged 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-caa2a97-3.10
Aug 25, 2022
Merged

[3.10] gh-95300: Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217)#96267
miss-islington merged 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-caa2a97-3.10

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes:
#95300

Related:
#91271
(cherry picked from commit caa2a97)

Co-authored-by: ov2k ov2k.github@gmail.com

…ythonGH-96217)

Fixes:
python#95300

Related:
python#91271
(cherry picked from commit caa2a97)

Co-authored-by: ov2k <ov2k.github@gmail.com>
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ov2k and @encukou: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@encukou encukou changed the title [3.10] Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217) [3.10] gh-95300: Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217) Aug 25, 2022
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 2f88289 into python:3.10 Aug 25, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-caa2a97-3.10 branch August 25, 2022 13:42
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants