Skip to content

Change function name in readme example#750

Merged
rmorshea merged 3 commits into
reactive-python:mainfrom
Archmonger:readme-example-update
Jun 17, 2022
Merged

Change function name in readme example#750
rmorshea merged 3 commits into
reactive-python:mainfrom
Archmonger:readme-example-update

Conversation

@Archmonger

@Archmonger Archmonger commented May 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just realized the name of the example in the readme is App. However, we really want to focus on giving users a more realistic component name to get them on the right track.

And truthfully, calling it App is a misnomer. The function itself is a component, even if run() is creating an ASGI app on the backend.

@Archmonger Archmonger added the flag-no-changelog Add to a pull request that does not require a changelog label May 1, 2022
@Archmonger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Side note, the new changelog check CI is fairly annoying. I think a "Welcome Message" CI reminding users to add a changelog entry if needed is a better approach.

@rmorshea

rmorshea commented May 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Yeah the changelog CI actions is definitely broken. Happy to just go with a welcome message on new MRs instead.

@Archmonger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This current PR is ready for review.

A separate PR created to modify the CI: #752

@Archmonger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yep, greetings message is broken.

@rmorshea

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

It seems like this might be a more general problem with permissions around forked repos.

@Archmonger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think I'll create my own "Greetings CI" repo to handle this without permissions.

@rmorshea rmorshea merged commit b0c7f93 into reactive-python:main Jun 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

flag-no-changelog Add to a pull request that does not require a changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants