-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix(deploy): complete Quadlet isolation review fixes #351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e4e5780
fix(deploy): isolate dev and prod Quadlet namespaces
919f22a
test(deploy): avoid requiring ignored production env
9c05821
fix(deploy): preserve exact Quadlet ownership during migration
d1fca46
fix(deploy): namespace only Quadlet identifier fields
cfc95e9
fix(deploy): complete Quadlet review hardening
2672701
fix(deploy): finish review documentation and diagnostics
49584f6
test(deploy): document worktree-scoped persistent data
d220dd4
fix(deploy): verify legacy Quadlet ownership before teardown
2529318
fix(deploy): guard legacy ownership and document local fallback
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (bug_risk): The
elif field == "Pod"branch is currently unreachable and can be simplifiedIn
namespace_identifier, the first conditionif field in {"Pod", "After", "Wants", "BindsTo", "Requires", "PartOf"}:already covers"Pod", so the subsequentelif field == "Pod":is never reached. IfPodneeds special handling, remove it from the set and rely on the dedicated branch; otherwise, remove theelifto avoid dead code.