AmneziaWG VPN packages

[xolophreny]

Testing the changes

• I tested the changes in this PR: YES

New package

• This new package conforms to the package requirements: YES, compiled and system-wide

Local build testing

• I built this PR locally for my native architecture, x86_64
• I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  • armv7l, cross

Alternative Wireguard implementation.
The DKMS module should be used whenever possible, the Go variant is slower and doesn't pass build checking, though otherwise works. I should be able to bring the issue up to the devs, and would like to ask if it could be included as a restricted package until the problem is resolved, or if it should be dropped entirely

[chrysos349]

I should be able to bring the issue up to the devs, and would like to ask if it could be included as a restricted package until the problem is resolved, or if it should be dropped entirely

why restricted? is there a licensing concern?

[xolophreny]

why restricted? is there a licensing concern?

Ah, no, pardon, I misunderstood the implications of failing build checks. That is the only issue with the thing, though I'm not familiar with Go software at all to provide more details. Just the "Unformatted code" in many Go files being the reason for failing, as mentioned in the template

And would appreciate more input on this as well, thank you

[ahesford]

Skipping checks is only acceptable if you can explain why the tests are expected not to work in the build environment. Skipping them to avoid solving the issue is not.

[xolophreny]

Understood, thank you! Will work on that