Skip to content

fix: ignore type inconsistency for now, fix build#1523

Merged
alexander-akait merged 3 commits into
webpack:nextfrom
anshumanv:fix/build
May 6, 2020
Merged

fix: ignore type inconsistency for now, fix build#1523
alexander-akait merged 3 commits into
webpack:nextfrom
anshumanv:fix/build

Conversation

@anshumanv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Fix build, there is type inconsistency with webpack@next types, this should ignore that error for now, we need to enable this once it's fixed.

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
NA

Summary

  • Fix build

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Other information
NA

@anshumanv anshumanv changed the title fix: build fix: ignore type inconsistency for now, fix build May 5, 2020
@anshumanv
anshumanv requested a review from alexander-akait May 5, 2020 04:40

@rishabh3112 rishabh3112 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO skip the tests for migrate for now as migrate as a feature isn't a blocker for us.

@anshumanv
anshumanv marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2020 05:37
@anshumanv
anshumanv requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2020 05:37
@anshumanv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Tests seem to pass now, I think we can let them stay

@webpack-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@anshumanv Thanks for your update.

I labeled the Pull Request so reviewers will review it again.

@shivaylamba Please review the new changes.

@snitin315

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think its good to merge.
/cc @anshumanv

@alexander-akait
alexander-akait merged commit 937c24a into webpack:next May 6, 2020
@alexander-akait

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Done :+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants